REP. BROWN-WAITE’S RESPONSE TO ANGRY DEMOCRATIC PARTY RHETORIC
Congresswoman Fights with Facts, Not Angry Slurs and Name-Calling
Washington, D.C.,
Feb 7, 2008 -
U.S. Representative Ginny Brown-Waite (FL-05) today released the following statement about the
media generated controversy surrounding her opposition to sending federal
income tax rebate checks to territorial citizens that do not pay federal income
taxes.
“When I was elected to
Congress, I was elected to represent the 5th District, the interests
of Florida,
and to be a fiscal conservative. The
important issue here is whether or not people who do not pay federal income
taxes should get tax rebate checks as part of the economic stimulus
package. Those who are personally
attacking me are just seeking to mask the fact that territorial residents will
be getting rebate checks from federal income taxes they never paid.
“I read the statements from
Central Florida Democrat Party leaders today and am deeply disappointed that
they engaged in the kind of race baiting politics we have come to expect from
their Party. Apparently when fiscal
conservatives have facts on their side, like I do here, the only way to defeat
them is to attack us personally. Whether
it is Bill Clinton in South Carolina, Hillary
Clinton in California or frequent Democratic
congressional candidate Charlie Stuart in Central Florida today, we are seeing
Democrats sink to new levels in desperation to capture Latino votes in Florida. Orlando
area Democrat leaders have taken a detailed policy discussion and turned it
into a personal attack. Perhaps they
realized that they cannot win on the issues, so they have resorted to name
calling and demagoguery.
“The facts are that I have
already issued a clarification that using the word territorial would have been
a better choice of words; case closed.
But the original issue of my press release stands unchallenged. Is it fair or fiscally responsible to give
tax rebate checks to folks who have not paid into the federal income tax
system? My 5th District
residents, and most Americans, would answer no.
“Some might ask where the
idea for this enormous federal income tax transfer originated. One of the Democrat leaders in the House,
Rep. Jose Serrano of New York,
issued a press release claiming credit for inserting this mammoth earmark into
an economic stimulus bill. Rep.
Serrano’s earmark is the type of backroom deal that the American public has
rejected time and again. They want
legislation to be debated out in the open, not tucked in at the last minute
with little or no discussion. This is
yet another example of Democrat leadership failing to live up to their promises
of being an ethical and open Congress.
“By attacking me personally,
instead of debating the issue of taxation and rebates, I believe some
individuals are trying to shift media focus away from the billion dollar
earmark that Rep. Serrano has inserted in the legislation. By calling me names they hope to draw
attention away from what amounts to an enormous transfer payment to the
government of Puerto Rico, not to its
residents; this is a direct transfer payment to territorial governments
disguised as tax rebates.
“Furthermore, instead of
taking real action to strengthen the economy, the Democrats proposed a package
that would give tax “rebates” to folks who have not paid into the federal
income tax system. It is not a rebate if
people have not paid taxes in the first place.
“My constituents overwhelmingly
want a fiscally conservative economic growth package that makes the tax cuts
permanent, cuts the corporate tax rate, currently the highest in the world, and
includes a stimulus for our seniors and veterans. Anything else is a job half done.”